The Meatgrinder and eBooks
Creating Kindle and iPhone versions of a book — simple. Selling them is another thing entirely.
Creating Kindle and iPhone versions of a book — simple. Selling them is another thing entirely.
Ann Michael joins the Scholarly Kitchen. Welcome!
A new study suggests that the venerated journal impact factor (JIF) may not provide a consensus view of “scientific impact.”
Image by George Eastman House via Flickr Abraham Lincoln, one of America’s greatest orators and a writer and speaker who influenced our penchant for simple language and short, punchy text, probably never finished working on his speeches, introducing ad libs […]
The US stimulus package supports science and higher education, wise investments now and for the long haul.
The 2008 update of “Did You Know?” continues its mind-blowing tradition.
Think email’s a thing of the past? Think again.
Newspapers are running out of ideas. A litany of desperate measures don’t bode well for a dying industry.
Indexing of proceedings papers, errors in conversion, draw ire from bibliometrics community. Some question its effect on journal Impact Factors.
On a day when Kindle 2.0 is expected the debut, the e-book is just one force reshaping the book of the future.
Publisher asks for submission stop while searching for new editor-in-chief.
Serialized print publishing has a frequency problem eating at its core. Can journal publishers anticipate and adjust?
While Google and Yahoo dominate online advertising in a keyword environment, could Facebook’s system dethrone them?
As publishers move out of the scarcity model, the social economy is where they might thrive. Can they?
Should scientists receive only partial credit for coauthored papers?