Dr. Strangelove, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Higher Education
With a bad job market for PhDs and heavy student debt, should we reexamine our expectations of higher education?
With a bad job market for PhDs and heavy student debt, should we reexamine our expectations of higher education?
Does an increase in article retractions signal a corrupt publishing system or just better policing?
Even when a paper is retracted, free copies of articles still persist in institutional repositories and public websites. Authority for the accuracy of scientific record must keep pace with open access. Fortunately there is a solution.
In many Chinese universities, authors are paid to publish. And the more prestigious the journal, the higher the reward.
Scandal sends shockwaves through library community. Publishers, meanwhile, see business in counter-culture books aimed at naughty librarians.
Publishing supplemental files online now common, but commenting remains rare, a new study reports.
After years of debate, ACRL will finally “walk the talk.” But without a business model, they could get tripped up.
Rather than relying on journal prestige and bibliometric indicators, universities should consider paying experts to conduct institutional peer review, report recommends.
How did “scholarly communication” become equated with open access advocacy? Is its misuse ultimately self-defeating?
Does cascading peer-review increase inappropriate submissions?
Should publishers endorse commercial editing services?
A study by two respected economists suggests it may be time to admit that we made a mistake attributing a citation advantage to open access articles.
Full of experimental biases and important omissions, what can be learned from the Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP) survey of scientists?
National economies and science usually move together. Why is Nigeria so different?
Within a few short years, China has become an economic and scientific powerhouse. Watch the dynamic bubble plot.