The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), Science, and the Public Good
If consumer web sites remain the source of most health information, there is little that FRPAA will do to improve the transmission of research to the public.
If consumer web sites remain the source of most health information, there is little that FRPAA will do to improve the transmission of research to the public.
At 99 cents, this may be the real “killer app” for open access publishing.
Publisher relaunches journal with new editorial board and scope, and a renewed focus on rigorous review.
A new review of the literature about open access’ effects on article citations attempts to rewrite the debate.
A guide to the values, cultures and scholarly communication behaviors of academics. A must read for publishers and technologists.
When is a subscription not a subscription?
The celebrated e-print service will now rely on annual library donations. Meanwhile, it’s long-term business plan is still in the works.
A new article suggests that institutional self-archiving mandates may benefit authors . . . if you ignore some inconsistent and inconvenient results.
Do medical editors have different quality standards based on the author’s geographic location?
Can one ideologue really hijack the OSTP forum on Open Access implementation?
Is it ethical for editors to alert authors of relevant in-journal articles?
National Academy of Sciences members contribute the very best (and very worst) articles in PNAS, a recent analysis suggests. Is diversity a better indicator of success than consistency in science publishing?
Scientist, editor, and OA advocate Jonathan A. Eisen rages against an infamous author-pays OA publisher.
A three-year NSF grant will create new tools for arXiv e-print repository.
Peer-to-peer sharing of scientific articles is common for Indian scientists, a new study reports.