It’s official: the most celebrated open access eprint repository — the arXiv — is moving to a “subscription-like” business model beginning this year.
Like most academic libraries, the Cornell University Library, which has hosted the arXiv since 2001, has experienced significant economic hardships and is looking for ways to defray costs. Their short-term (three-year) plan is to ask libraries of the heaviest user institutions (based on their number of downloads) to make small annual contributions to keep the resource going. This does not really fit the definition of “subscription,” since access will not be turned off for any institution that does not pay the fee, nor will it prevent individuals from uploading documents. It’s more in line with a National Public Radio model of fund-raising, although the white paper is careful not to use words like “charity” or “donation” and there is no offer of a coffee mug or tote.
The arXiv’s long-term business plan is not yet set, although hints of what it may look like include support from academic libraries and research centers, societies, endowments, and government grants from agencies such as the National Science Foundation. The arXiv received an $883,000 stimulus grant last year for updates and improvements to the service.
Undoubtedly, the announcement of a new funding model for the arXiv comes at a poor time, when many academic libraries are facing severe budget cuts. Still, 22 of the top 25 heaviest users have already pledged support, according to their news release.
While this sounds as if fund-raising will be a simple matter, the total contributions from these 22 institutions amount to only $88,000 if they are paying the recommended $4,000/year pledge. The arXiv currently costs $400,000/year, with costs projected to reach $500,000 in 2012.
Getting donation pledges from institutions further down the user list may be much more difficult, considering that their users will not lose any services from the arXiv. In addition, the business plan makes no mention of the additional time and resources needed to manage annual billing and payments for a subscription-like service.
The business plan both explains and promotes the arXiv and its effect on scholarly communication:
arXiv has been one of the most important disruptive innovations in scholarly communications since the advent of the Internet. Its preemptive dissemination model represented the first significant means to provide expedited access to scientific research well ahead of formal publication. It remains an exemplar in the open-access debate.
And yet, the model of charging libraries seems quite traditional for supporting an open access service when alternative models charge authors or their funding agencies for support. Many readers may also take issue with whether the arXiv has truly disrupted scientific publishing (as Michael Clarke wrote recently), or whether eprints and journal articles share a “productive co-existence.”
When the arXiv moved from Los Alamos Labs to Cornell University, its placement in the library was seen as a commitment to the long-term stability of the arXiv. In 2008, before the financial crash, Anne Kenney, Cornell’s University Librarian, remarked on the success of the service:
[the arXiv] represents an incredible model for scholarly communication that transcends borders, publishers and time. We bring operational stability and a demonstrated track record of stewardship to this invaluable open-access resource.
Reacting to the recent change in the arXiv’s business model, Ann Okerson, Associate University Librarian at Yale University, feels that the library’s move reflects ordinary growing pains for any successful service:
One day we realize that the puppy we brought home from the pound turned into a cross between a Great Dane and a Mastiff. How to feed and care for it? We’re still missing reliable models for that.
Fred Dylla, Executive Director and CEO of the American Institute of Physics, has optimism for the future of the arXiv, although the change does send a clear message to all stakeholders that high-value scholarly publishing cannot be done on the cheap:
This development sends an important message to the all sides of the scholarly publications community: a scholarly publications service requires a sustainable commitment of income and professional resources. I’m sure that Cornell will be up to the challenge.
Cornell Library deserves appreciation for its continued custodianship of the arXiv, an indispensable resource in physics. We hope the library will find partners to support them in moving it forward. We at IOP would be pleased to collaborate in any way that is helpful.