Research4Life’s Dubious Claims and Missing Report
Free scientific journal access programs claims to boost article output in developing countries. A deeper analysis of the data shows otherwise.
Free scientific journal access programs claims to boost article output in developing countries. A deeper analysis of the data shows otherwise.
Librarians must choose between fiscal irresponsibility and a conflict with academic freedom when establishing open access publication funds.
European countries could save millions of Euros if they switched to open access publishing and self-archiving, a report suggests. But is this report based on valid assumptions?
Freely-accessible articles are cited more frequently, but open access is not the cause, a new study reports.
The journal that sparked a peer-review controversy has resumed publishing its ousted editor’s work.
In creating a ‘level playing field’ for open access publishers, we put non-profit publishers at a great disadvantage.
The claim that all physics articles are deposited in the arXiv is a myth, according to recent study of self-archiving.
Will $800 buy you a publication in a Bentham Science journal?
No new editor, a submission stop, and an announcement to authors to select another journal. As if this weren’t enough, the backlog of unpublished manuscripts is being cleared at an unprecedented rate.
Elsevier deserves blame for publishing “fake” journals. Doctors share some of the blame too. Let’s not view them as victims.
The CPI is an excellent tool for calculating the cost of living but a very bad tool for measuring the purchasing power of libraries.
$50K is more than enough money for an author OA fund claims Cornell Library Board.
Early feedback motivates future success in YouTube and Digg. Does the same feedback explain scientific publishing?
“I have seen the future, and it doesn’t work.” — John Senders, pioneer of the electronic journal
Lawsuits against British rock band, Coldplay, illustrate the blurred distinction between inspiration and theft.