PNAS: Tighter Editorial Policy Improves NAS Papers
After years of tightening its submissions policy, papers contributed by NAS members start resembling direct submissions.
After years of tightening its submissions policy, papers contributed by NAS members start resembling direct submissions.
Why do publishers and platform providers spend so little time seeking incremental improvements?
Can PLOS exist without a mega-journal?
Researchers claim that PMC boosts citations by 26%. A closer look at the paper reveals serious data and analysis problems. Can we collectively design a better study?
Stop thinking of peer review as a concept and start thinking of it as a toolbox.
Clean, data rich, and intuitive, forest plots can be used to visualize publication metrics.
When journals provide academy members a VIP submission track, do their papers perform any better?
Why did such a small price increase arouse such a big reaction from open access advocates?
The publication experience of authors may come down to a single factor: was the manuscript accepted?
Can network-based metrics allow us to separate true scientific influence from mere popularity?
Journal additions, suppressions, new metrics and an improved user interface are included in this year’s Journal Citation Report (JCR).
Establishing new citation benchmarks and an international board of academics, Elsevier is poised to take on Thomson Reuters for dominance in the citation metrics market.
If a free website claimed that you could double citations to your papers simply by uploading them to their file sharing network, would you believe it? Or would you check their data?
Scholars are citing an increasingly aging collection of scholarship. Does this reflect the growing ease with accessing the literature, or a structural shift in the way science is funded–and the way scientists are rewarded?
First released in 1935 as a game to teach children the evils of unchecked market capitalism, MONOPOLY-The Publishers’ edition keeps the tradition going.