Halloween Over, Still Scary Times — Please Vote!
Halloween has concluded, but things are still looking scary in the US for public health.
Halloween has concluded, but things are still looking scary in the US for public health.
Journal-based scholarly communication needs a structural change
Some thoughts on this year’s Open Access Week theme, “community over commercialization.”
How can smaller publishers support the Sustainable Development Goals?
In this post, Alice Meadows shares some thoughts about PLOS’s recently announced R&D project to help overcome the lack of recognition for Open Science contributions, and the lack of affordability for researchers.
Daniel Dollar offers an update on the work being done by Research4Life and a call for action.
Antitrust litigation has been filed against six major scholarly publishers. We reached out to the community for their thoughts.
Revisiting Rick Anderson’s 2022 post which asks, are libraries “neutral”? That question is way too simplistic to serve as anything other than a political football.
Today we offer a double-post, with a proposal and a response concerning how we frame our efforts toward Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility as a community.
The strike at Springer Nature raises questions about how editorial work is valued.
Research publications contain the answers to some of the world’s most pressing challenges. But to realize that potential, more people need to find, understand and act on them.
How will the American Sunlight Project make it more costly for bad actors to spread disinformation — and what does this mean for scholarly publishing?
An update on progress from the STM Research Integrity Hub.
In copyright law, the existence of licensing options impacts upon a rights owners exclusive rights.
We asked Campus Disability Services leaders, “What would you most like Publishers to know?”