Journalism and Driving — Technology Enables Amateurs
Amateurs with similar machines as professionals have emerged before. Instead of travel, this time, it’s information.
Amateurs with similar machines as professionals have emerged before. Instead of travel, this time, it’s information.
Sci Foo Camp 2009 — Day 3. Journals of the future, video games, rocketships to Mars. It’s all in a day’s work.
European countries could save millions of Euros if they switched to open access publishing and self-archiving, a report suggests. But is this report based on valid assumptions?
If publishers of all types don’t invest in the next thing, they’re the only ones who will suffer. But the barriers are high, and new competitors may be better positioned to fulfill the future.
Day 2 of Sci Foo Camp was full of interesting topics and discussions, including artificial intelligence, citizen science, and the future of scholarly publishing.
The overtly religious views of Francis Collins, nominated to run the NIH, is creating a controversy deserving of careful attention.
Amazon’s options and pattern of doing business suggests the STM publishers had better prepare for a dramatically more digital future.
A writer for “Fast Company” accidentally reveals that there may be no respite for publishers as pure digital invaders come to plunder them.
Part 1 of a 3-part series — Amazon’s proprietary e-book platform needs to open up in order to truly thrive.
Anderson says Free is the “future radical price.” Gladwell says free may not be the future. Godin simply says “Malcolm is wrong.” Why are all the arguments so polarized?
A common systemic problem links oversight of financial risks and author-pays peer-review. Both are potentially calamitous.
We’ve all read declaration after declaration that the publishing business model is dead and needs to be replaced by a new one. So far, no one seems to have any idea exactly what that new business model should be. A few recent examples are examined….
Gladwell tackles Anderson, Nielsen tackles Christensen. Both provide useful insights for publishers today.
In creating a ‘level playing field’ for open access publishers, we put non-profit publishers at a great disadvantage.
Thinking about the Kindle as an e-book reader rather than a wireless reader makes you miss some of the benefits of not owning books.