The Subtle Conflicts of Interest All Humans Face
Not all conflicts are monetary. Sometimes, the pressure to do something good can lead to biased behavior.
Not all conflicts are monetary. Sometimes, the pressure to do something good can lead to biased behavior.
An inflammatory essay reveals its author to be neither well-informed or fair.
A compelling essay points out some interesting wrinkles to the access debate.
A boycott is being organized in California against Amazon to oppose Amazon’s resistance to collecting state sales tax. But Amazon may be too interwoven in the world today to be effectively opposed.
Dissemination may be necessary but not sufficient as an element of an information mission in today’s world.
What happens to your online persona after you die? A surprising number of people are thinking about this.
The network effect is a peculiar thing. It can be about lolcats or insurrection. Either way, it’s a new and different power.
Social media continue to evolve, with Google Plus being the most recent conspicuous entry. Scholarly publishers may find these new platforms can be useful in evolving new forms of communications.
All primary data should be made openly available, a UK government report recommends.
The attention economy gets a theatrical/thriller treatment. Time is money.
Smaller animals, smaller planets, smaller elements, and fewer effective drugs — is science becoming lower-yield, even at the paradigm level?
NASA makes us look up and inspires young children to pursue science, all for 1/2 a cent on the tax dollar. Why are we letting it slip into oblivion?
Rebuttals are cited less, don’t change citation patterns for original papers, and generally fall flat. And you thought science was self-correcting?
An Internet activist hacks MIT to hack JSTOR, even though he had access through Harvard. Now, he’s facing federal charges.
New research demonstrates that there’s a decent likelihood that your data exhaust can be used to find out sensitive things about you.