The Rhetorical Consequences of STM "Madlibs" — Saving [ __________ ] from [ ____________ ]
Instead of filling in the blanks of attribution with the same old agents, maybe we need to go beyond the usual suspects.
Instead of filling in the blanks of attribution with the same old agents, maybe we need to go beyond the usual suspects.
The orphan works problem is not easily resolved, but it may not be such a big problem, as books mostly become orphans because there is little demand for them.
A new form of cybercurrency is edging into the mainstream, but is it something we should embrace or repel?
Are author manuscripts in institutional repositories “good enough” for public consumption?
Patron-driven acquisition — what does it mean? This FAQ deals with how PDA approaches books, journals, and libraries.
The mental models associated with print are still defining how we work and design. Why has this persisted?
A viral book sensation’s obvious story may not be as obvious as some think, harder to replicate, and indicative of a strong counter-trend.
From the archive: an interview of a medical ghostwriter and an inside view of the medical communications industry — both speakers featured at the 2011 SSP Annual Meeting.
Humor about scientific misconduct may reflect a deeper, more serious side of academic culture gone wrong.
Privacy concerns seem aimed at the small stuff, but could expand into a system of censorship.
Established publishers don’t have the luxury of start-ups of ignoring existing operations, which makes it harder to fully engage with the Web. But an established brand can help create an extended marketing network.
At Cornell University, you can rent a bicycle from the circulation desk. Should the library be peddling a different brand?
This is a parable of the role in innovation in publishing and makes the case that we should not criticize companies that try and fail to do new things.
This time, the winner is . . . just as ambiguous.
A massive study of student papers by Turnitin reveals that many are copying text from Wikipedia and other user-generated sites, but it’s not clear in distinguishing text-matches from plagiarism.