Editors for Hire — Providing Assistance or Exploiting Hopes?
Should publishers endorse commercial editing services?
Should publishers endorse commercial editing services?
Why do smart people continue to seek simple rank-order listings of inherently complex phenomena?
A study by two respected economists suggests it may be time to admit that we made a mistake attributing a citation advantage to open access articles.
Maligned though it often is, the Big Deal for journals is likely to get bigger, marginalizing the offerings of smaller publishers.
Full of experimental biases and important omissions, what can be learned from the Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP) survey of scientists?
“Free” is an illusion and an insult. All information we want costs money, and we as creators want it to cost money.
What do you do? (a poll)
The CHE features some of the parody videos about academic life, including this one about academic librarians.
Now that the vaccine-autism link has been shown to be based on a fraud, will ego continue to trump humility in the face of evidence?
As new business models emerge and funding sources change, can professional societies and not-for-profits respond? Or will they keep their heads buried in the sand?
An interesting and entertaining debunking of some obvious fluffs in medical science, with a chilling reminder of how libel laws in some countries can kill scientific discourse.
When Nature goes head-to-head with PLoS, will non-profit society publishers take the hit?
With the economic benefits of open access open to reinterpretation, will the moral benefits prove sufficient to withstand the coming scrutiny? And will it all begin a race to the bottom?
It’s time to abandon the library-as-victim narrative and write a new story.
An essay in the New York Review of Books about the Google Books Settlement is based on flawed reasoning. Here’s why.