Will a Renewed Re-examination of the Big Deal Itself Be a Big Deal?
As budgets make librarians look for better deals, the Big Deals fall under close scrutiny.
As budgets make librarians look for better deals, the Big Deals fall under close scrutiny.
A review of the literature shows that access conditions are getting better, not worse. So, why do we hear just the opposite?
The economic stagnation sweeping the globe is hitting academia. For publishers and others, the implications can be severe and long-term.
As publications move to digital form, libraries are taking on a greater share of the total volume of publishers’ income. This inevitably leads to conflicts.
Overburdened by supplemental data, journal limits publication to “essentials” plus non-article formats.
More proof that Google isn’t making us “stooopid” — rather, we’re just being human, and that’s OK.
A teen nails the woes of the blithely pampered.
While all sustainable publishing requires funding, where the funding comes from, why it’s provided, who provides it, when it’s provided, and what they expect for it sheds some light on some key issues.
Does the success of the scalable, multidisciplinary open access mega journal signal the imminent demise of the specialized, highly-selective subscription journal?
The Harry Potter series will now be available as e-books. Among the lessons for publishers is the desirability of direct-marketing.
A new initiative to feature online content shows its cards when it names the ultimate honor it can convey on selections.
A new study being touted by Nicholas Carr reveals a lack of healthy skepticism and more problems with “methodologically sound.”
What are the key issues for scholarly publishing today? Setting the agenda for productive discussion.
Revisiting a popular and important post — the editorial fallacy, that belief that more or better manuscripts can save you from disruptive change.
The downside of silent filters becomes crystal clear in this important talk.