Blogs Meet Academic Biases, Are Offered an Ironic Prize for Good Online Content
A new initiative to feature online content shows its cards when it names the ultimate honor it can convey on selections.
A new initiative to feature online content shows its cards when it names the ultimate honor it can convey on selections.
A new study being touted by Nicholas Carr reveals a lack of healthy skepticism and more problems with “methodologically sound.”
What are the key issues for scholarly publishing today? Setting the agenda for productive discussion.
Revisiting a popular and important post — the editorial fallacy, that belief that more or better manuscripts can save you from disruptive change.
The downside of silent filters becomes crystal clear in this important talk.
Instead of filling in the blanks of attribution with the same old agents, maybe we need to go beyond the usual suspects.
The orphan works problem is not easily resolved, but it may not be such a big problem, as books mostly become orphans because there is little demand for them.
A new form of cybercurrency is edging into the mainstream, but is it something we should embrace or repel?
Are author manuscripts in institutional repositories “good enough” for public consumption?
Patron-driven acquisition — what does it mean? This FAQ deals with how PDA approaches books, journals, and libraries.
The mental models associated with print are still defining how we work and design. Why has this persisted?
A viral book sensation’s obvious story may not be as obvious as some think, harder to replicate, and indicative of a strong counter-trend.
From the archive: an interview of a medical ghostwriter and an inside view of the medical communications industry — both speakers featured at the 2011 SSP Annual Meeting.
Humor about scientific misconduct may reflect a deeper, more serious side of academic culture gone wrong.
Privacy concerns seem aimed at the small stuff, but could expand into a system of censorship.