An Interview With Keith Collier, Co-Founder of Rubriq
With the creation of Rubriq, co-founders Shashi Mudunuri and Keith Collier have broken new ground. Rubriq is an attempt to provide peer-review independent from journals.
With the creation of Rubriq, co-founders Shashi Mudunuri and Keith Collier have broken new ground. Rubriq is an attempt to provide peer-review independent from journals.
A new composite of nighttime satellite images reveals the Earth at night — and a remarkable boom town in North Dakota.
Will massive open online courses (MOOCs) disrupt higher education? With recent announcements, the potential seems to be growing.
A great analysis of why it was technologically impossible to fake the 1969 moon landing.
Free services and open access are distorting the publishing world. Will the big only get bigger?
A new publishing ecosystem is emerging that includes among its participants O’Reilly Media, Pearson, Safari Books, Barnes & Noble, Microsoft, and Liberty Media. This new ecosystem may come to challenge the proprietary ebook networks of Amazon and Apple.
As traffic continues to come in through side doors, what is the function of the home page?
Having trouble getting our email alerts? Please let us know.
The herd of social sharing sites in the sciences is being culled. And one — Mendeley — may be assimilated by Elsevier.
With the NFL playoffs at their peak, what better time to have a little fun at the expense of highly paid players?
In the follow-up to “What Are STM Publishers Doing Wrong?” we explore what STM publishers are doing right. It’s an impressive list.
A new proposal regarding federally funded data is leaked. What might a broad policy for public access mean?
The first of a two-part series, today we review a long and complicated list of things STM publishers are doing wrong. Tomorrow, we’ll explore the opposite question — what are STM publishers doing right?
A new report on institutional information expenditures raises the real possibility that instead of their being a pricing problem, there’s a quantity problem driving expenditures.
Recent data from the Guardian suggests that commenting remains a fringe activity, often dominated by a few voices. What might this mean for initiatives based on altmetrics and post-publication review?