+1 Deer: The Latest Trend in Social Media via The Onion
The Onion’s ever-entertaining fake news service offers up this perfect explanation of the current state of social media, as the established companies scramble to remain relevant.
The Onion’s ever-entertaining fake news service offers up this perfect explanation of the current state of social media, as the established companies scramble to remain relevant.
Social media presents a new set of marketing opportunities for publishers, the most important of which is a new paradigm for thinking about the world of digital media, which now is the world of the social stream instead of the world of cyberspace.
Peter Brantley of Hypothes.is talks about efforts to bring an open layer of annotation to the Web, and what they mean for scholarly communication.
Join a group of Scholarly Kitchen “Chefs” for a session at the upcoming Publishing Business Conference & Expo.
Mitch Joel talks about how to survive and thrive in the current era of technology-driven change.
A conversation with information scientist Carol Tenopir.
Revisiting the subject of social media and scientific research–have we made much progress in the last few years?
Back in 2009, I wrote a post about the death of the television schedule. In the post, I discussed shelf life versus participation value for content, highlighting the rare entertainment events like sports that continue to offer a semblance of […]
Do we as publishers, societies and libraries understand how to grapple with the needs of academics with such a range of cultures?
Scholarly Kitchen chef Alice Meadows discusses the challenges, and opportunities, for scientific societies in an Internet era.
Chef Phil Davis discusses the current state of the art in analysis of citation, usage, and other information sources, and some of the opportunities and challenges for bibliometrics in a data-rich era.
An advocate for alternative metrics for article impact takes stock of where they are now, and where they’re going.
A proposal for a community site to review author experiences at various journals suggests the need for a new player in the trust economy of journals.
Social networking and crowdsourcing have attributes that may make them both incompatible with the goals and process of science. Can we accept that?
As new metrics are explored, not everything equates to “impact.” Getting our terms right will help us get our thinking straight.