Business Models, Marketing, Social Media, World of Tomorrow

Custom “Membership”

Members Only
Image by DocZork – restless via Flickr

How can membership business models, based to some extent on the concept of exclusivity, flourish in an environment increasingly driven by collaboration, openness, and participation?

The prevalence of collaboration tools, social networks, and search capabilities combined with the proliferation of accessible content, has made maintaining membership rolls challenging.

To make matters worse, potential new members often have expectations that conflict with those of existing membership.

How can a membership organization meet the competing needs of different groups and still sustain itself and serve its larger mission?

Could we pull non-members into the planning and execution of events or activities in which they may be interested, giving them a connection to the organization, the mission, and the existing membership before they’re faced with a decision to “join”?

In some cases, could providing interaction with non-members increase learning opportunities for our current members?

Could we offer non-members features, like credential verification and access to credentialed online communities, for free and then offer them opportunities to pay for additional products or services they want to consume?

Could ideas like this be the basis of “custom membership,” where different levels of interest or affiliation are offered at different price points?

Perhaps we could use a model based on flow.  The flow of people through an organization over time where their relationship with the organization changes as their needs change.  Payment models could also vary based on their consumption and contribution.

Is membership a sustainable concept at all in the era of open participation?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

About Ann Michael

Ann Michael is President of Delta Think, a publishing consultancy focused on innovation in product strategy, development, and content management. Delta Think has worked with many major commercial and non-profit scholarly publishers as they clarified their business objectives, defined new content products and business models, re-architected their content processes, introduced new tools and technologies, and developed the skills and expertise needed to be successful in an ever changing publishing environment.

Discussion

2 Responses to “Custom “Membership””

  1. Fantastic questions. As people are able to organize themselves into collaborative social groups, it is critical that membership organizations find ways to differentiate and provide distinctive value for participating.

    In the same way publication is changing, the model of membership needs to change as well. It is something that our organization has explored over the past four years and we’re still working to get the mix correct.

    Posted by Todd Carpenter | Apr 8, 2009, 7:02 am
  2. Todd –

    It seems as though models based on limited distribution, exclusivity, physical location, etc need to consider some fundamental shifts. I don’t think all of these things will go away – but they’re on the verge of an evolution – or a redefinition of their value to their target audience.

    Another one on my mind lately has been conferences. When we’re always connected and continuously learning, it seems as though the value of conferences, as a source of information, is pretty limited. The value must be derived from something else (networking, problem solving, etc.).

    Thanks for commenting!

    Ann

    Posted by Ann Michael | Apr 8, 2009, 11:17 am

Side Dishes by Stewart Wills

Find Posts by Category

Find Posts by Date

April 2009
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

The Scholarly Kitchen on Twitter

SSP_LOGO
The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is "[t]o advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking." SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.
......................................
The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,754 other followers

%d bloggers like this: