Low-Hanging Fruit and the Re-Ordering of the Value Chain
As new business models emerge and funding sources change, can professional societies and not-for-profits respond? Or will they keep their heads buried in the sand?
As new business models emerge and funding sources change, can professional societies and not-for-profits respond? Or will they keep their heads buried in the sand?
An interesting and entertaining debunking of some obvious fluffs in medical science, with a chilling reminder of how libel laws in some countries can kill scientific discourse.
When Nature goes head-to-head with PLoS, will non-profit society publishers take the hit?
With the economic benefits of open access open to reinterpretation, will the moral benefits prove sufficient to withstand the coming scrutiny? And will it all begin a race to the bottom?
Extending our mental lives and creating communication wormholes — in addition to carrying more than we ever thought we could — is all the result of becoming cyborgs.
The artificiality of Internet inventions and experiences is about novelty, not artificiality. We’ve always been pretenders.
Wikipedia’s 10th anniversary must be acknowledged, and its seismic, worldwide redefinition of the reference work recognized.
It’s time to abandon the library-as-victim narrative and write a new story.
Want to see the business models behind PatientsLikeMe.com, Groupon, and Spotify? Here they are, along with 7 others from 2010.
A lovely little skit about what happens when your Blackberry is broken.
As new analytical tools emerge, editors can harness them to advance their craft — or find their craft automated out of their hands.
Short-form and long-form content are flourishing, while that “just right” middle ground is vanishing.
In 2011, the power of the individual consumer will set your strategies.
New publishers today are all Born Digital in their outlook, eschewing print strategies as expensive and difficult to break into.
An essay in the New York Review of Books about the Google Books Settlement is based on flawed reasoning. Here’s why.