The Next E-book Device Is Already Here
The next new e-book reading device is already here. (You may already own one.)
The next new e-book reading device is already here. (You may already own one.)
Who will really suffer if newspapers fail? The Onion has the inside story.
When customers get angry, they’ll resort to all sorts of tricks to be heard. Is it wise for a publisher to take a hard line over the inevitable?
Publishers can now shovel from two sources: print and online. Will they shovel again when migrating to the tablet? Or will they think anew?
With Google, Twitter, Facebook, and email doing most of the work, why are we building big, expensive, multifaceted sites? Are we being strategic? Or are we in a rut?
The “Power of Print” ad blitz enlists YouTube to get its message out, inviting the question: If print isn’t dead, why?
The Scholarly Kitchen now has an additional Twitter feed. Follow us and enjoy our drive-thru window.
O’Reilly launches the “live book,” a way to extend the useful life of a book by turning hardware into software.
A large university embraces video applications, and more than 1,000 students submit, mostly via YouTube. Here are some clever videos spotlighting some of today’s college applicants.
CrossRef moves into the reference works area for e-books, with a linking approach and pricing that might just work.
Google Buzz has dragged Gmail into the social sphere. Will it be a match made in heaven? Or does it remind users of someplace farther south?
2Collab and Connotea are choking on spam, and they may not have the right scale or architecture to avoid a future defined by it.
Why Google apparently gives government documents more protections than 19th century texts is just one of the puzzles in their usage guidelines.
E-reading devices were shown off at the 2010 PSP Annual Meeting. Unfortunately, the iPad probably still dominated the setting, even in abstentia.
Experienced Open Data advocates realize that making data available costs money, making people aware of the data costs money, and creating a community of users costs money. And that data aren’t that easy to open.