[…] the criteria of “peer review quality” are, would be even more at a loss. And yet if you were to ask members of the general public whether they think it matters that published science and scholarship be held to high […]
There is always a new tool, method, or model, but no organization can do it all. This month we asked the Chefs about methods for prioritizing choices.
[…] the margins, and to do one’s best to be kind and thoughtful and careful and aware. David Smith: Who better to ask than a white, middle aged, middle class, (relatively*) affluent male; a citizen furthermore, of a nation that once ruled […]
In advance of Peer Review week, what are your ideas for ensuring diversity in peer review? Come see what the Chefs had to say and add your ideas to the conversation!
Does a Master’s in Publishing make someone a more desirable candidate for a publishing job? Will that degree make them more successful if hired? See what the Chefs and our guest contributors say!
Last week was the Society for Scholarly Publishing Annual Meeting in Arlington. The Scholarly Kitchen Chefs talk about what they learned at the meeting and how it impacted them.
We check in with scholarly publishing vendors for their experiences at the 2023 SSP Annual meeting in Portland.
The beginning of the holiday season means it’s time for our annual list of our favorite books read (and other cultural creations experienced) during the year. Part 1 today.
Hillary Corbett, the Director of Scholarly Communication & Digital Publishing at Northeastern University, and Charlotte Roh, the Scholarly Communications Librarian at the University of San Francisco, tell us what they learned at this year’s SSP Annual Meeting!
We asked the Chefs to weigh in with their thoughts on the new “Towards Responsible Publishing” manifesto from cOAlition S.
With the world in chaos around us, this month we’ve asked the Chefs about superpowers! What would YOU select if you could pick any superpower? Let us know.
Are you looking forward to this year’s SSP Annual Conference? We are! This month we asked the Chefs which sessions they were planning to attend and why.
As we think about open research and equity, we introduce a new type of post: “ Ask the Community”, where we invite others to answer the same question put to the Chefs, with a deliberate focus on some of the […]
[…] color or ethnicity. Sixth, if we want to improve the diverse representation of authors in our journals, we need to ask ourselves: are we working on core problems which may be causing low quality, weak research outputs in the first […]
Karin Wulf and Rick Anderson discuss some implications of a recent research report on the future of the scholarly monograph.