A flawed article claiming that manuscripts don’t change much between being preprints and published articles somehow makes it through peer review unchanged.
The debate on Green OA continues, as many people challenge the premise that the existence of Green OA articles will result in the cancellation of subscriptions to those articles.
There is an unstated theory of the e-book, which assumes that a book consists only of its text and can be manipulated without regard to the nature and circumstances of its creation. This is only one theory of many, but it is now the prevailing one.
A new study suggests a weakening of the relationship between a journal’s impact factor and the articles published therein. An unorthodox analysis and unwillingness to share data for validation purposes raises serious questions about how seriously to take this study.
The “listener support” model works in some cases. This fact alone suggests it may not have a robust future in the funding of scholarly initiatives.
In a business environment characterized by risks, upstart innovations, and even contempt for the law, publishers have to ward off threats the old-fashioned way, by out-innovating their rivals and preempting new services.
Trends in mobile, cloud, and personal computing all point to a redefinition of privacy, with convenience and value competing effectively for preeminence.
When is a subscription not a subscription?
The celebrated e-print service will now rely on annual library donations. Meanwhile, it’s long-term business plan is still in the works.
A three-year NSF grant will create new tools for arXiv e-print repository.
When it comes to downloads and citations, position in the arXiv matters, a new study finds.
The claim that all physics articles are deposited in the arXiv is a myth, according to recent study of self-archiving.
Position in a daily arXiv email report can determine future citations. A German physicist struggles to determine why.