Atlantic Records Logo from 1966 to 2005.

Image via Wikipedia

The travails of the music industry have been applied and misapplied to scholarly publishing as the digital age has emerged. One true but still unheeded lesson is that locking value to a fixed medium — even a Web site — will have limited success (not none, but limited). However, a recent lesson learned by Atlantic Records (as reported in the New York Times) holds what I think will be a new and true lesson for scholarly publishers — the elimination of waste will look like the pie is shrinking.

Atlantic Records has become the first major label to generate the majority of its revenues from digital sources:

With the milestone comes a sobering reality already familiar to newspapers and television producers. While digital delivery is becoming a bigger slice of the pie, the overall pie is shrinking fast. Analysts at Forrester Research estimate that music sales in the United States will decline to $9.2 billion in 2013, from $10.1 billion this year. That compares with $14.6 billion in 1999, according to the Recording Industry Association of America.

Atlantic Records says that while it has achieved this ratio, its CD sales have not declined as quickly as the overall market.

Note that it’s a difference in rate, not direction. CD sales are tanking. And that’s where the elimination of waste comes in. (By the way, I don’t buy the digital piracy explanation — the cassette was an excellent and widespread music-sharing [aka, piracy] medium, and I find it’s much harder nowadays to find pirated music online than it was to get a friend to put a couple of albums on a 90-minute cassette.)

In the CD era of music, the only way to get a song you liked was to buy the entire CD. There was no real equivalent of the 45 single of the LP era. Buying all those extra songs meant waste — wasted money for the consumer. Maybe some of the other songs were also good, but usually the extra $10 and 10 songs constituted waste.

Except for the recording industry. It represented pie. Delicious, wholesome financial pie.

Now, purchasing a digital download allows multiple behaviors that were not available before:

  • Listening to a 30-second sample to determine if you really want to spend the money
  • Putting the music in your shopping cart and thinking about buying it while you go off to spend time doing something else
  • Buying one song and returning to buy the rest of the album if you choose, or maybe just 1-2 more songs

From a consumer’s perspective, the pie of the CD era was full of waste — songs purchased on fixed media because there was no other choice, which artificially inflated revenues beyond true demand.

Now, demand and supply are more accurately calibrated, and the recording industry’s pie seems to be shrinking. But consumers are getting what they want.

There is waste in scholarly publishing business models, from site licenses that amount to fixed digital goods to print issues, and the ability for users to eliminate waste from their purchasing decisions is limited.

Will it remain this way forever? Or has it already changed?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]