The Year in Review: 2022 in The Scholarly Kitchen
Before we launch into 2023, a look back at 2022 in The Scholarly Kitchen.
Before we launch into 2023, a look back at 2022 in The Scholarly Kitchen.
Editors at The BMJ are lousy at predicting the citation performance of research papers. Or are they?
Observations on reproducibility and research integrity from London STM Week
Iain Hrynaszkiewicz discusses PLOS’s Open Science Indicators initiatives and shares initial results.
Small-scale and low-cost activities can make a huge difference in making your organization more disability inclusive.
Thoughts on open access (OA) from the perspectives of both the publisher and library communities at the Charleston Meeting.
We don’t talk very much about physical production values for books. What message does that send to readers of scholarly titles?
The beginning of the holiday season means it’s time for our annual list of our favorite books read (and other cultural creations experienced) during the year. Part 1 today.
An interview by @lisalibrarian with Simon Linacre, author of “The Predator Effect”
The latest developments in Capybara science.
Erich van Rijn looks at the University of California’s Luminos open access books program and reviews lessons learned and what is needed for such programs to succeed.
Though open access indicators within a given publishing platform are relatively consistent, significant inconsistency across platforms likely creates user confusion.
Significant breakthroughs in jargon have enabled the development of the hyper encabulator, sure to serve all your encabulation needs.
Mark Robertson and Rachel Moriarty discuss the STM Association’s Mentorship Program.
Christos Petrou analyzes changes in the speed of publication of research articles over the last ten years.