[…] Approach (MECA) – what problems would be solved if we followed this new set of recommendations? Tony Alves: Two specific workflows precipitated the formation of MECA, focused on reducing the effort of authors during the submission process, and allowing reviewers […]
[…] of the process. So, your view is that creating a taxonomy doesn’t necessarily imply a value judgement over whether one workflow is better or has more integrity than another. Lois: Correct! What’s best for one journal, publisher, or field is […]
[…] of your authors and readers! Last but not least, I’ve used journal publishing as my example here, as it’s the workflow that I’m most familiar with. But all forms of peer review should be similarly transparent in terms of their […]
[…] the new market entrants’ approach. As Roger Schonfeld has noted, competition for content is moving steadily upstream in the research workflow. In this context, it is striking to note how few publishers have sought to develop their own preprint servers, […]
[…] strategy needs to address all three of these key elements in the same way. In recent years, some publishers and workflow providers have attempted to move towards a model that separates content distribution from the business issues of pricing and […]
[…] fall into four categories: Tools to identify bad content, or sometimes assure good content Tools to identify bad actors AI-assisted workflow tools to make life easier/quicker for editors and reviewers Platforms that integrate workflows and tools The tools space is […]
[…] technology that meets people where they are while enabling them to move towards better ways of working. Design from a workflow-first position. Build tools that conform to how people work. Understand the value of open source. Collaboration and transparency breed […]
[…] of flowchart diagrams. For those who are used to working with COPE guidance these should be encouragingly familiar. There are workflow documents for each of the four areas and these will be available in the coming weeks. Who are these […]
[…] for journals can absolutely apply to video content. Workflows: Hybrid events require more complex workflows than traditional in-person conferences. The workflow is highly dependent on the format of the event. If a lot of pre-recording is involved, especially with author […]
[…] reliably aggregated, surfaced, and queried, or capture the full range of editorial practices and events needed to accommodate new publishing workflows in which reviews may be conducted by multiple parties, in different ways, at multiple points in time. But they […]
[…] post is by Sylvia Izzo Hunter (Marketing Manager), Igor Kleshchevich (Senior Software Engineer), and Bruce Rosenblum (VP of Content and Workflow Solutions, and the 2020 NISO fellow), all with Inera, an Atypon company. For more on preprints, the Society for […]
[…] and not expect the user to find their way to the library environment.” ResearchGate is a well-established platform for researcher workflow and its proactive outreach strategies, metrics and analytics reports, and social networking features all work to further solidify scholar […]
[…] management and publishing platforms about support for the suggested changes above, as well as other miscellaneous changes to peer review workflow. You can view all responses in this table. The responses cover four major areas, explored in detail below. Publishing […]
[…] about open items it contains into discovery services and tools that may have broader purposes or fit into a traditional workflow. And these workflow services need not be other search engines. One interesting model can be found in browser extensions. […]
[…] many different sources — whether it’s from colleagues, editors, authors, reviewers, or even readers. I regularly audit our peer review workflow and processes to assess what is working well for our authors and what could be improved. My primary goal […]