The Scholarly Kitchen

What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing

  • About
  • Archives
  • Collections
    Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    Collections
    • Scholarly Publishing 101 -- The Basics
    • Academia
    • Business Models
    • Discovery and Access
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility
    • Economics
    • Libraries
    • Marketing
    • Metrics and Analytics
    • Open Access
    • Organizational Management
    • Peer Review
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology and Disruption
  • Translations
    topographic world map
    Translations
    • All Translations
    • Chinese
    • German
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Spanish
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow

Archives: Journal Impact Factor

Editors can’t spot talent. I’ve heard this joke before. It isn’t funny

Editors at The BMJ are lousy at predicting the citation performance of research papers. Or are they?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 15, 2022
  • 3 Comments

Journal Citation Indicator. Just Another Tool in Clarivate’s Metrics Toolbox?

Can Clarivate deliver on a single, normalized measurement of citation impact or did its marketing department promise too much?

  • By Phil Davis
  • May 24, 2021
  • 2 Comments

Changes to Journal Impact Factor Announced for 2021

Starting 2021, Journal Impact Factors will be calcuated using online publication dates, not print ones. But phased roll-out may lead to bias for some journals.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 7, 2020
  • 13 Comments

Skeletons In Their Closet: Clarivate Issues Editorial Concern But Takes No Further Action

A public allegation of citation manipulation among 5 journals deserves a public inquiry.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 11, 2018
  • 11 Comments

How Traditional Publishing Works

Thus the defining property of traditional publishing is editorial selection. That is what publishing is about.

  • By Joseph Esposito
  • Sep 17, 2018
  • 50 Comments

How Much Editorial Misconduct Goes Unreported?

Editors are in a position of power to coerce authors to cite their journal and personal papers. Can algorithms help detect misconduct when authors and journal staff are unwilling to speak out?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 21, 2018
  • 8 Comments

Journal Growth Lowers Impact Factor

Phil Davis examines how publication timing can affect annual Journal Impact Factor scores.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 13, 2018
  • 13 Comments

Journals Lose Citations to Preprint Servers

Why do authors continue to cite preprints years after they’ve been formally published?

  • By Phil Davis
  • May 21, 2018
  • 60 Comments

The One-Percent Club For Top-Cited Papers

As an alternative to the Journal Impact Factor, editors propose an index that measures highly cited papers.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jul 31, 2017
  • 8 Comments

Does Journal Suppression Reduce Self-Citation?

Journal suppression is an effective tool for reducing high rates of self-citation, even years after a title is reintroduced.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 22, 2017
  • 3 Comments

Reverse Engineering JCR’s Self-Citation and Citation Stacking Thresholds

Now we know how suppression decisions are made, should metrics companies suppress titles at all or simply make the underlying data more transparent?

  • By Phil Davis
  • Jun 5, 2017
  • 7 Comments

How Much Citation Manipulation Is Acceptable?

Is citation manipulation a moral problem or an accounting problem?

  • By Phil Davis
  • May 30, 2017
  • 15 Comments

Citation Performance Indicators — A Very Short Introduction

A brief summary of the main citation indicators used today.

  • By Phil Davis
  • May 15, 2017
  • 22 Comments

Citation Cartel Or Editor Gone Rogue?

How much can a single editor distort the citation record? Investigation documents rogue editor’s coercion of authors to cite his journal, papers.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Mar 9, 2017
  • 14 Comments

CiteScore–Flawed But Still A Game Changer

The real innovation of CiteScore is not another performance metric, but a new marketing model focused on editors.

  • By Phil Davis
  • Dec 12, 2016
  • 18 Comments
Older

Official Blog of:

Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The Chefs

  • Rick Anderson
  • Todd A Carpenter
  • Angela Cochran
  • Lettie Y. Conrad
  • David Crotty
  • Phil Davis
  • Joseph Esposito
  • Robert Harington
  • Haseeb Irfanullah
  • Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe
  • Phill Jones
  • Roy Kaufman
  • Scholarly Kitchen
  • Alice Meadows
  • Ann Michael
  • Alison Mudditt
  • Jill O'Neill
  • Charlie Rapple
  • Dianndra Roberts
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • Tim Vines
  • Jasmine Wallace
  • Karin Wulf

Most Recent

  • Guest Post – Of Special Issues and Journal Purges
  • Controlled Digital Lending Takes a Blow in Court
  • The Internet Archive Loses on Controlled Digital Lending

Recent Tweets

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
letpub LetPub @letpub ·
9 Feb

@scholarlykitchn reflects on the diverse, equitable, inclusive, and accessible (DEIA) community in scholarly communications: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/02/07/know-better-do-better-learned-publishing-reflects-on-deia-in-scholarly-communications/ #diversity #inclusion #DEIA #scicomm

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
scholarlypub SSP @scholarlypub ·
9 Feb

• Today on @scholarlykitchn • https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/02/09/guest-post-introducing-two-new-toolkits-to-advance-inclusion-in-scholarly-communication-part-2/?utm_campaign=coschedule&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=ScholarlyPub

Retweet on Twitter Scholarly Kitchen Retweeted
jafurtado Jose Afonso Furtado @jafurtado ·
9 Feb

Chefs de Cuisine: Perspectives from Publishing’s Top Table - Steven Inchcoombe, by Robert Harington @rharington / @scholarlykitchn https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/01/30/chefs-de-cuisine-perspectives-from-publishings-top-table-steven-inchcoombe/

Follow the Scholarly Kitchen Blog Follow Us
Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP)

The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking. SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.

The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.

  • About
  • Archives
  • Chefs
  • Podcast
  • Follow
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Website Credits
ISSN 2690-8085