Authority, Business Models, Controversial Topics, Experimentation, Research, Social Role, Sociology, Technology, World of Tomorrow

OSTP Public Access Memo Deadlines Loom Over Us

OSTP FY 2014 Budget Briefing (201304100027HQ)

OSTP FY 2014 Budget Briefing (201304100027HQ) (Photo credit: nasa hq photo)

This is just a quick note about two looming deadlines regarding the OSTP open access (OA) memo. The National Research Council (NRC) is holding two hearings on the memo in mid-May, but registration is required to view the webcasts, and May 8 is the last day to register. Registration is very simple here:

One two-day hearing is on publications, and the other is on data. There are four options for each hearing — attend and speak, attend, view the webcast, or submit written statements. I encourage everyone to submit written statements and at least glance at the webcasts. Written statements are due by May 10 and are limited to two pages. Write early, write often.

The purpose of these hearings is to gather information, not to provide it, so I do not expect the funding agencies to reveal their OA plans at this time, if they even have them. Using the NRC in this way is a bit puzzling. One wonders if the agencies are trying to make this not look like a rule making, which it most certainly is.

For those new to the issues surrounding the OSTP OA memo, the Kitchen’s larder is well-stocked with background material. See for example the following grist for written statements:

Enhanced by Zemanta

About David Wojick

I do strategic consulting where science, technology and policy meet. My strategic insights grow from original research on complex issues and technological revolutions. I also do applied research on scientific communication.


3 thoughts on “OSTP Public Access Memo Deadlines Loom Over Us

  1. It would be better if NRC accepted written comments after the hearings so people can respond to the issues raised therein. I urge people to request that the deadline for written coments be extended to a week after the hearings, a form of post publication review as it were.

    Posted by David Wojick | May 6, 2013, 7:30 am


  1. Pingback: The federal mandate for open access: Is there a downside? | Copyright Roundup - May 6, 2013

  2. Pingback: Hearings on OSTP Public Access Memo | Scholarly Communication at Mason - May 7, 2013

The Scholarly Kitchen on Twitter

Find Posts by Category

Find Posts by Date

May 2013
« Apr   Jun »
The mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing (SSP) is "[t]o advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking." SSP established The Scholarly Kitchen blog in February 2008 to keep SSP members and interested parties aware of new developments in publishing.
The Scholarly Kitchen is a moderated and independent blog. Opinions on The Scholarly Kitchen are those of the authors. They are not necessarily those held by the Society for Scholarly Publishing nor by their respective employers.
%d bloggers like this: